(myFOXDetroit.com) -
Joining Huel Perkins in the Fox 2 Studios on Wednesday to weigh in on both sides of two ballot proposals facing voters on November 6th:
Proposition 4
Bob and Patricia Haynes take care of disabled adult children and without any say or consent had money taken out of their medicaid money to go to the union representing home health aide workers. They're NOT in favor of Prop 4.
In favor of Prop 4, is Scott Heinzman. He's with Adapt Michigan.
Propostion 5
In favor: Oakland Co. Sheriff Michael Bouchard
Opposed: Paul Welday - Republican Political Consultant
Opposed: Steve Hood - Democratic Political Consultant
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PROPOSAL 12-4 A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO ESTABLISH THE MICHIGAN QUALITY HOME CARE COUNCIL AND PROVIDE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING FOR IN-HOME CARE WORKERS This proposal would:
Allow in-home care workers to bargain collectively with the Michigan Quality Home Care Council (MQHCC). Continue the current exclusive representative of in-home care workers until modified in accordance with labor laws.
Require MQHCC to provide training for in-home care workers, create a registry of workers who pass background checks, and provide financial services to patients to manage the cost of in-home care.
Preserve patients' rights to hire in-home care workers who are not referred from the MQHCC registry who are bargaining unit members.
Authorize the MQHCC to set minimum compensation standards and terms and conditions of employment.
Should this proposal be approved?
YES __
NO ____
According to a recent survey:
The polling firm Foster | McCollum | White | Baydoun recently conducted a poll in which 1,122 respondents fully participated. The margin of error for this total polling sample is 2.93% with a confidence level of 95%.
If the election was held today, how would you vote on Proposal 12-4 the "home care council & collective bargaining" amendment?
|
Vote yes for the proposal 12-4 amendment
|
47.36%
|
|
Vote no on the proposal 12-4 amendment
|
36.37%
|
|
Undecided on the proposal 12-4 amendment
|
16.27%
|
PROPOSAL 12-5 A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO LIMIT THE ENACTMENT OF NEW TAXES BY STATE GOVERNMENT This proposal would:
Require a 2/3 majority vote of the State House and the State Senate, or a statewide vote of the people at a November election, in order for the State of Michigan to impose new or additional taxes on taxpayers or expand the base of taxation or increasing the rate of taxation.
This section shall in no way be construed to limit or modify tax limitations otherwise created in this Constitution.
Should this proposal be approved?
YES __
NO __
According to a recent survey:
The polling firm Foster | McCollum | White | Baydoun recently conducted a poll in which 1,122 respondents fully participated. The margin of error for this total polling sample is 2.93% with a confidence level of 95%.
If the election was held today, how would you vote on Proposal 12-5, the Michigan Alliance for Prosperity amendment?
|
Vote for yes to approve this amendment
|
25.76%
|
|
Vote no on this amendment
|
43.59%
|
|
Undecided on the ballot question
|
30.65%
|
